Rob Reid on ‘Copyright Math™’

A wonderful outline of the absurd figures the MPAA and other organisations claim are being lost through piracy.

Source: mentalfloss.com

On A Good Day by Joanna Newsom

A great performance from Newsom on the David Letterman Show a couple of years ago. I know she’s not up everyone’s street, but she’s one of my favourite performers and songwriters, and this album (Have One On Me) contains a few of my best-loved songs by any artist.

Source: youtube.com
Thor

Firstly, let me start with a complaint that is not unique to this film. I’m sick to death with films that have the dialogue absurdly low in the mix, and the action turned right up to 11. It means you have to watch the whole film with a finger on the volume control if you don’t wish either to miss out on the plot, or have your neighbours banging on the door asking if they should be evacuating the flat due to some terrible structural deficiency.

Thor itself is an entirely unremarkable film. It’s competently put together, and watchable enough, but I’m not sure I can give you any reason why it would be worth your time. It has the plot, dialogue and level of special effects of any of the more recent superhero movies. It has entirely two-dimensional characters with whom it’s hard to make any emotional connection and the action scenes (annoyingly noisy as they are) are all banging, crashing and CG with no style.

That’s not to say that there’s anything particularly bad about this film, Natalie Portman, Chris Hemsworth and Stellan Skarsgård put in perfectly good performances within the script they’ve been given and Kenneth Branagh shows that he can direct an average superhero movie as well as he can direct Shakespeare. It’s just that there are a million movies in the world, and the chances are you’ve seen this one already, probably many, many times.

Thor

Firstly, let me start with a complaint that is not unique to this film. I’m sick to death with films that have the dialogue absurdly low in the mix, and the action turned right up to 11. It means you have to watch the whole film with a finger on the volume control if you don’t wish either to miss out on the plot, or have your neighbours banging on the door asking if they should be evacuating the flat due to some terrible structural deficiency.

Thor itself is an entirely unremarkable film. It’s competently put together, and watchable enough, but I’m not sure I can give you any reason why it would be worth your time. It has the plot, dialogue and level of special effects of any of the more recent superhero movies. It has entirely two-dimensional characters with whom it’s hard to make any emotional connection and the action scenes (annoyingly noisy as they are) are all banging, crashing and CG with no style.

That’s not to say that there’s anything particularly bad about this film, Natalie Portman, Chris Hemsworth and Stellan Skarsgård put in perfectly good performances within the script they’ve been given and Kenneth Branagh shows that he can direct an average superhero movie as well as he can direct Shakespeare. It’s just that there are a million movies in the world, and the chances are you’ve seen this one already, probably many, many times.

Instapaper 4.1

A nice update to a lovely app. I’d been keen on having a few new font choices for a while, and now they’re here, they look excellent. I can’t wait to see them on the new retina iPad.

Minilook Kiev

I’m a sucker for a well-made tilt-shifted time-lapse video, and this one from Kiev is a particularly lovely example.

For a long time I used the web interface for Gmail on my Mac. From time to time I’d try another email app, but it wouldn’t provide the speed and ease of just using Gmail in a browser.

However, a few months ago, I downloaded Sparrow for the Mac. At first I wasn’t sure, and kept using Gmail a lot, but as time went by, I gradually moved across to using Sparrow as my primary mail client. It’s simple, it’s easy, it fits in well with Gmail accounts, and when I decided to abandon Gmail, I found it made the transition really simple. In summary, I love Sparrow for the Mac.

I’d heard rumours around for some time that Sparrow were making an iPhone version of their Mac app, and for the last month or so I’ve been trying to get a look at screenshots and see if any of the beta testers had reviewed the app. What I saw made me excited - Sparrow for iPhone looked like exactly what I wanted - a simple, elegant iPhone Mail client.

Today the app launched, and so I got my first hands-on experience. It’s not a disappointment. Sparrow is indeed simple both to use and set up, and is beautifully designed, borrowing many of its design cues from the now-defunct Tweetie (which got bought by Twitter, and subsequently ruined). Once you’ve added in your email accounts and, optionally, your Facebook details (if you like having Facebook avatars for your contacts), you’re faced with an inbox not entirely dissimilar from the one found in the iPhone Mail app. However, if you swipe across to the right, you’ll find all of your mail folders and accounts, and if you swipe across to the left on a message, you’re given the option to reply, star, move, archive or delete the message (you can find the same options from within a message by tapping on the tiny arrow in the bottom right of the screen). Dealing with your email is faster and much more simple than before.

Writing a new message is also easier. Tap the tiny ‘new message’ button in the bottom right corner and up pops a list of all of your contacts, which you can either scroll through or search, choosing people to send to, Cc or Bcc. From there, typing the message is done simply enough, and adding a photo takes a simple tap on the paperclip icon. None of the message-writing part is particularly different from any other mail app, but neither does it need to be. The developers have simplified what needs to smoothed in a mail app, and kept the rest as unaltered and familiar as possible.

Sparrow, therefore, gets much right. It’s a great app to use. The only downside right now is getting email notifications. Sparrow attempted a version that used the VOIP multi-tasking to keep the app running in the background (which is not entirely different from how the official iPhone Mail app works) but it was rejected by Apple (unsurprisingly). Sparrow can’t afford to run their own push servers, and don’t want the headache of dealing with the personal information that entails, so as it stands there’s somewhat of an impasse, and thus the app doesn’t push anything to notification centre. I’ve currently got the app in my iPhone dock as my primary mail app, and have left on Apple’s own mail notifications as a bit of a fudge, and it works well enough, but I hope this gets fixed soon.

I think that Sparrow have made an app that’s as close to a perfect mail app as one could hope to expect, and blows competitors out of the water1. The notification issue doesn’t ruin the app for me, but it’ll be great to see it fixed in the near future.

Download Sparrow for iPhone

Edit 19/3/12
If you’ve downloaded the app, there’s a nice Tumblr that outlines some of the less obvious features.



Not least, Google’s own Gmail app, which is a terrible piece of work. It’s clunky, relies heavily on webviews, seems to need to be logged in repeatedly and is horrible to use. ↩

For a long time I used the web interface for Gmail on my Mac. From time to time I’d try another email app, but it wouldn’t provide the speed and ease of just using Gmail in a browser.

However, a few months ago, I downloaded Sparrow for the Mac. At first I wasn’t sure, and kept using Gmail a lot, but as time went by, I gradually moved across to using Sparrow as my primary mail client. It’s simple, it’s easy, it fits in well with Gmail accounts, and when I decided to abandon Gmail, I found it made the transition really simple. In summary, I love Sparrow for the Mac.

I’d heard rumours around for some time that Sparrow were making an iPhone version of their Mac app, and for the last month or so I’ve been trying to get a look at screenshots and see if any of the beta testers had reviewed the app. What I saw made me excited - Sparrow for iPhone looked like exactly what I wanted - a simple, elegant iPhone Mail client.

Today the app launched, and so I got my first hands-on experience. It’s not a disappointment. Sparrow is indeed simple both to use and set up, and is beautifully designed, borrowing many of its design cues from the now-defunct Tweetie (which got bought by Twitter, and subsequently ruined). Once you’ve added in your email accounts and, optionally, your Facebook details (if you like having Facebook avatars for your contacts), you’re faced with an inbox not entirely dissimilar from the one found in the iPhone Mail app. However, if you swipe across to the right, you’ll find all of your mail folders and accounts, and if you swipe across to the left on a message, you’re given the option to reply, star, move, archive or delete the message (you can find the same options from within a message by tapping on the tiny arrow in the bottom right of the screen). Dealing with your email is faster and much more simple than before.

Writing a new message is also easier. Tap the tiny ‘new message’ button in the bottom right corner and up pops a list of all of your contacts, which you can either scroll through or search, choosing people to send to, Cc or Bcc. From there, typing the message is done simply enough, and adding a photo takes a simple tap on the paperclip icon. None of the message-writing part is particularly different from any other mail app, but neither does it need to be. The developers have simplified what needs to smoothed in a mail app, and kept the rest as unaltered and familiar as possible.

Sparrow, therefore, gets much right. It’s a great app to use. The only downside right now is getting email notifications. Sparrow attempted a version that used the VOIP multi-tasking to keep the app running in the background (which is not entirely different from how the official iPhone Mail app works) but it was rejected by Apple (unsurprisingly). Sparrow can’t afford to run their own push servers, and don’t want the headache of dealing with the personal information that entails, so as it stands there’s somewhat of an impasse, and thus the app doesn’t push anything to notification centre. I’ve currently got the app in my iPhone dock as my primary mail app, and have left on Apple’s own mail notifications as a bit of a fudge, and it works well enough, but I hope this gets fixed soon.

I think that Sparrow have made an app that’s as close to a perfect mail app as one could hope to expect, and blows competitors out of the water1. The notification issue doesn’t ruin the app for me, but it’ll be great to see it fixed in the near future.

Download Sparrow for iPhone

Edit 19/3/12 If you’ve downloaded the app, there’s a nice Tumblr that outlines some of the less obvious features.


  1. Not least, Google’s own Gmail app, which is a terrible piece of work. It’s clunky, relies heavily on webviews, seems to need to be logged in repeatedly and is horrible to use. 

Luck, PETA and Horse Racing

The HBO show Luck has been cancelled after a third horse died during it’s filming. It’s sad that a horse has died and I would guess that it’s fair to say that HBO did what they could to avoid such things happening, but who knows?

The thing I found interesting was the quote from Kathy Guillermo of PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals). She said:

Racing itself is dangerous enough. This is a fictional representation of something and horses are still dying, and that to me is outrageous.

There’s a weird, tacit hierarchy she seems to imply from this statement.

  1. Best of all would be to have no horse racing at all.
  2. Second best would be to have horse racing, but no fictional representation of racing (this is ‘bad enough’)
  3. The worse situation (‘outrageous’ indeed) is to have both racing, and fictional representations of it

But ethically speaking (and these people to have the word ‘Ethical’ in their organisation’s name, after all), what’s the difference between killing a horse as part of a horse race, or killing a horse as part of a fictional representation of a horse race? The two situations are purely about entertainment. Is the real-life race in some way more acceptable than its fictional representation?

Strangely, and I would guess rather inadvertently, PETA seem to be saying that killing horses for racing is more morally defensible than killing them for a TV show. And yet the standards of care for horses in most TV shows will be better than for many races. Indeed, even just UK horse racing has polished off 804 horses in 5 years, and three horses died just yesterday, two at Cheltenham (Abergavenny, Featherbed Lane) and one at Southwell (Palawi).

The issue I have with PETA here is the way they seem focused on aiming for high-PR, low-hanging fruit, hurting companies that are doing relatively little wrong, whilst ignoring massive industries that are doing much, much worse. It makes them very difficult to take seriously. While I’m sure they feel they’ve done something very impressive in getting HBO to cancel Luck, I’d be surprised if it made any difference to the overall treatment of horses anywhere.

Florence

Taken from just outside the church of San Miniato al Monte

Florence

Taken from just outside the church of San Miniato al Monte

Source: Flickr / minifig
Snowy Rooftops of Siena

The day we visited Siena was one of the coldest of the whole holiday. This is taken from a little area you can visit from the Museo Dell’Opera near the Cathedral, looking across towards the Piazza del Campo (on the right).

Snowy Rooftops of Siena

The day we visited Siena was one of the coldest of the whole holiday. This is taken from a little area you can visit from the Museo Dell’Opera near the Cathedral, looking across towards the Piazza del Campo (on the right).

Source: Flickr / minifig

How Amazon Ruins its Customer Service by using Yodel

Back in the middle of February, I ordered a new coffee machine from Amazon. I’d heard good things about the Gaggia Classic and I knew that my wife and I would be in the house for the next few days, a relatively unusual occurrence since both of us have jobs and work at home pretty rarely.

On the 17 February, the coffee machine arrived. I set it up, but something was clearly wrong. However closely I followed the (appallingly written, but that’s another matter) instructions, the machine just wouldn’t work. I called Phillips (because they do customer support for Gaggia in the UK) and they suggested I call Amazon to get a new one sent to me, since there was nothing they could do for this particular machine.

This was frustrating, but not really anyone’s fault. A relatively complex piece of machinery such as this was bound to have a failure rate, and we were just unlucky to have one that didn’t work. When I called Amazon, they were fantastic, put in an order for a new machine, and two days later the second one arrived. This one worked just fine, and makes lovely coffee.

But unfortunately, after this good experience with Amazon’s customer service, then things took a turn for the worse. Amazon, understandably, wanted the non-working machine returned, and sent me to their website to arrange an appointment with Yodel, a collection/delivery company. I went to their website and arranged a day the next week when I happened to be working from home. The email I received said they’d got my request and would send me confirmation for that date once it was booked.

Except they didn’t.

Indeed, even by the day of the supposed collection, I’d heard nothing from anyone at Yodel, so I emailed them back and asked them if I should expect someone to pick up the package. By lunchtime I’d heard nothing1, so I assumed no-one was coming and went out to get some lunch. While I was out, someone did get back to me to tell me that a delivery was booked that day, so I rushed home.

However, by the end of the day, no-one from Yodel had arrived. Annoyed, I emailed them again, asking what I should do next, since no-one had turned up, and they told me to arrange another collection time. However, the next working day I was going to be in the flat all day (since that is the only time they’ll come) was in two weeks’s time. I asked for a date then, but they said they could only book up to one week in advance, which seemed a little strange. They said to email them again when there was only one week to go.

Weird though this was, I did exactly that, and emailed them again, asking for a collection date of today (14 March). I heard nothing back. After a couple of days, I emailed again, and still heard nothing. I emailed one more time, but got no response at all.

So, today was the big collection day, and I’d heard nothing back from Yodel. I had, however, received an email from Amazon, reminding me (politely) that I only had until the 25 March to return this object, before they’d charge me for it. I decided to call Yodel. Their phone line charges you 10p per minute, plus further network charges, and tells you this, excruciatingly slowly, before putting you through some terrible menu system that’s entirely confusing for someone who’s not just waiting on a simple delivery. I eventually got through to one person, who told me she wasn’t the right person to speak to, and she then put me through to someone else.

This guy was polite enough, but told me that there was no record of any collection being arranged for today, despite my four emails. He also told me that it’s perfectly possible to book collections weeks and weeks into the future if need be. I asked him if he could arrange one for today, but he said no. He could arrange another day, but that’s no use to me, since the way I can afford to buy coffee machines from Amazon is by having a job, and broadly speaking, they expect me to be at the office during the time that Yodel do their collecting. He did, kindly, tell me that they would collect from anywhere, but I didn’t particularly fancy carrying a coffee machine to work, since if I was going to do that, I may as well have bought one from a shop near work, and carried it home, avoiding this system entirely.

I hung up.

Annoyed, I called Amazon, who again were perfectly helpful. They told me that if I took this to a Post Office, and sent it to the place on the return label I’d printed off for Yodel, they’d refund the cost, and that’s exactly what I did at about 12pm today. Everything went smoothly, and when I got home, I called Amazon, told them the amount and they put the full cost of the postage back onto my card.

As you can see from this lengthy, and rather tedious story, Amazon’s customer service has been utterly faultless. They’ve been fast, polite and sensible. They’ve done everything they can to solve problems that have happened as quickly as possible, causing the least possible inconvenience to me. Indeed, after the final call, I was sent a quick questionnaire, which I answered positively, saying that Amazon’s service has been brilliant, they’ve just been let down by the terrible service provided by Yodel.

I wish this is something that Amazon would address. My office has trouble accepting parcels for employees, so I can’t send things there easily. I love using Amazon, but if they send anything through a company other than Royal Mail, I often can’t receive it for weeks, due to the sort of games you have to play with third party delivery companies. Indeed, without the Royal Mail option, I don’t think I’d buy anything from Amazon again.

Amazon Prime looks like a great service, but because they don’t use Royal Mail for it, it’s of no use to me. Amazon need to fix this fast because I’m getting more and more hesitant to order anything from them. I have no faith at all in any quoted delivery time, and if there’s a fault, I have to deal with situations like the one above to sort them out. Honestly, I’d rather just pay a bit more and buy the item in a normal bricks and mortar shop.

Finally, and just to show their level of competence, four hours after I called them and they told me they had no record of any collection being booked, and two hours after I’d taken the coffee machine to the Post Office, someone from Yodel arrived at my door to collect my parcel. When I told him what had happened, he sighed resignedly, like this was what happened most days, and left.


  1. In fact, on that same day, someone from Yodel turned up to deliver another package. I asked him if he wanted to take this collection at the same time, but he didn’t. Fair enough I guess, although it did seem a little like their computer systems could be improved. 

IT Helpdesk in a Spinwheel

Uh huh. Yeah, that’s pretty much it. (via)

IT Helpdesk in a Spinwheel

Uh huh. Yeah, that’s pretty much it. (via)

Source: happyplace.com

Byword for Mac now on iOS

And it’s a nice conversion. I’d prefer to have slightly more options in the fonts, but I’m guessing that they’ll add more in time. Each iOS text editor I try seems to have at least one feature that doesn’t work well, or just isn’t there, but Byword so far seems complete. I’m going to try it for a while as my sole iOS text editor.

Simon’s Cat in ‘Shelf Life’

A new Simon’s Cat episode is a good remedy for those midweek blues.

Source: youtube.com

putthison:

The new series of Put This On gets going with a trip to New York. So great to have it back.

Source: putthison
Hugo Magic Shop

On Flickr, Alex Eyler (Profound Whatever) is back and has created another beautiful Lego scene, this time of the station magic shop in Martin Scorsese’s Hugo. (via)

Hugo Magic Shop

On Flickr, Alex Eyler (Profound Whatever) is back and has created another beautiful Lego scene, this time of the station magic shop in Martin Scorsese’s Hugo. (via)

Source: Flickr / hoyvinmayvin